Hi M,
How was your day? And how was the debate ?
Methinks I'm leaning toward in this order -
Elizabeth Warren - https://en.wikipedia.org/ wiki/Elizabeth_Warren
Joe Biden - https://en.wikipedia.org/ wiki/Joe_Biden
Kamala Harris - https://en.wikipedia.org/ wiki/Kamala_Harris
Andrew Yang - https://en.wikipedia.org/ wiki/Andrew_Yang
Cory Booker - https://en.wikipedia.org/ wiki/Cory_Booker
- after this 2nd Democratic Debate (2 - https://www.cnn.com/ politics/live-news/democratic- debate-july-31-2019/index.html), and also think Joe Biden could be most likely to beat the current president, and is among the smartest and most accomplished.
They're all really smart, but Biden is very smart as a politician, in my experience, and especially re image-making (which is a key point for Manuel Castells in the current book by him that I'm reading "Communication Power" and with which I agree; if elections are like horse races, per Castells too, I think Biden could most likely and masterfully win this one in 2020). I also appreciate his vast experience in the Obama administration as VP, closest to the office of the presidency of all these candidates. And I don't think he would waffle out over 4 or 8 years as I wondered about on Cuttyhunk with you and Peg. What do you think? He also knows the language of these debates, and these politics re presidential politics. And having been Obama's VP, I think he would successfully work against racism - and to "heal the racial divide" per a question I just heard in the debates. I agree too with Andrew Yang re both UBI and technology and re risk to jobs, and health care too, but I think the way he presents his ideas are as outliers, and too far from Biden's and many center. Andrew is also thinking about the future re information technology in more sensible ways than the rest of them. I like too Elizabeth Warren's re-framing re the big picture, and feistiness (reminding me a bit of Dad even). Hopefully the democratic candidate for president will synthesize the best of all of these idea generators. (These candidates are all pretty strong - time to narrow the field? Glad too we have so many candidates of color! Congratulations, America!:).
Now who will win the Democratic nomination? Probably none of the above ...
I also hope any Dem president might develop a single cryptocurrency with block chain for all 7.5 billion people, and explore doing this with Universal Basic Income experiments in all ~200 countries -
blogspot.com/2019/04/adrift- by-wind-sailor-velella-full. html.
Adrift by-the-wind sailor (Velella): Full house for Hamilton (musical) on a Wednesday afternoon Orpheum SF ... Color conscious cast * * * Could E.W. come to office in 2020 running policy-wise on a single cryptocurrency backed by some number of ~200 countries' central banks - and even Universal Basic Income experiments (on a BANK Card - as 'product,' - e.g. the 'debit cards' mentioned here "Will ‘basic income’ become the California norm? Stockton starts $500 no-strings payments" ... https://www.sacbee.com/news/local/article226280230.html - or for those who have them, on smart phones) - in the same way Alexander Hamilton started the U.S. banking system in the US, . And re Castells
- https://scott-macleod.I found this evening's debate slightly more engaged than last evening's.
Could be emailing this to Alden, Sandy, David T, John K, and more friends, but may just blog it instead, and thus engage in a unique kind of "communication power" per Castells. :)
And I'll be content in my own world with developing wiki MIT OCW-centric World University and School in ~200 countries and 7111 known living languages - potentially creating 2.2. million jobs (in the US and in all ~200 countries' languages, and re diversity as well) - and also my actual-virtual Harbin Hot Springs' ethnographic project, bagpiping, and beginning a family.
What do you think now after the debates, M? Who do you think would be your current 'picks' as well?
L, Scott
Here are the two Democratic Debates' links from CNN which should have recordings of them soon -
*
...